Audit and govern
production AI agents.

[ ENGAGEMENTS: AUDIT // GOVERNANCE // ACTIVE: US + EU ]

Most enterprise AI agents in production have never been independently reviewed. Vector Systems delivers two-week audits and ongoing governance frameworks — built on the rigor regulated industries demand, applied to any enterprise running agents at scale.

01. Diagnostic

Five Questions

Answer these about the AI agents you run in production. If you cannot, an audit is the next step.

01

When your agent makes a decision in production, can you explain why — with evidence — to a board member, a regulator, or a customer?

02

What is your agent's failure rate? Do you measure it, or do you find out when users complain?

03

If your agent hallucinated a tool call, exfiltrated data, or escalated outside policy — would your team know within minutes, hours, or never?

04

What evidence of human oversight could you produce if asked tomorrow? Logs are not an audit trail.

05

If the model provider changes the underlying weights next quarter, how will you know your system still performs?

02. Services

Two Engagements

The audit finds what is broken. The governance framework keeps it fixed.

[ ENGAGEMENT_01 ]

AI Agent Audit

Two-week structured assessment of a production agent system. Architecture review, failure mode testing, output quality, observability gaps, governance risks. Written report. Severity-scored findings. Fixed fee.

  • Reasoning chains, tool use, memory, escalation paths
  • Adversarial testing against the specific deployment
  • Regulatory exposure mapping where applicable
  • Remediation roadmap with effort estimates
[ ENGAGEMENT_02 ]

Governance Framework

Ongoing infrastructure that keeps agents reliable as they scale, change, and accumulate edge cases. Standards, evaluation pipelines, monitoring, and human-oversight architecture. Quarterly review cadence.

  • Automated evaluation of reasoning, tool use, goal alignment
  • Decision-level logging — what was decided, on what evidence
  • Human-in-the-loop checkpoints at defined risk thresholds
  • Continuous regression testing against drift

Post-audit build work — remediation of specific findings — is available selectively and scoped to what the audit identifies.

03. Process

How the Audit Works

Two weeks. Independent. Built to survive board, customer, or regulator scrutiny.

[ WEEK 01 // ARCHITECTURE REVIEW ]

We map your agent system from input to action. Topology, model selection, prompt design, RAG sources, tool access, memory and state, escalation logic. We identify where autonomous behavior exceeds intended scope before testing begins.

  • Agent topology and decision pathways
  • Tool access surface and permission boundaries
  • RAG sources, retrieval logic, citation tracking
  • Memory, state, and multi-agent handoff integrity

[ WEEK 02 // FAILURE MODE TESTING ]

We test against the specific attack surface of your deployment. Adversarial inputs, prompt injection, hallucinated tool calls, cascading errors in agent chains. Output reliability under load. Guardrail effectiveness against your real-world traffic.

  • Adversarial input testing and jailbreak attempts
  • Tool-call validation and data exfiltration paths
  • Output quality under load and edge cases
  • Cost, latency, and behavior drift over volume

[ COMPLIANCE MAPPING ]

Findings cross-referenced against the regulations applicable to your sector and jurisdiction. Most technical audit firms cannot do this. Most compliance consultancies cannot do the technical work. We deliver both — evidence-ready documentation in formats compliance teams can submit directly.

  • EU AI Act Articles 9, 14, 15 where in scope
  • FINMA Circular 2023/1, FCA AI guidance, FinCEN, HIPAA, SOC2
  • Evidence packages for internal model risk review
  • Jurisdiction-specific mapping by deployment type

[ DELIVERABLE // WRITTEN REPORT ]

25–40 page written report. Severity-scored findings. Remediation roadmap with effort estimates. Executive summary for board or regulator presentation. Built to be acted on within a week of delivery.

  • Critical, high, medium, low severity by finding
  • Remediation roadmap with effort and priority
  • Executive summary suitable for board distribution
  • Optional walkthrough with the technical team
vector-systems.json
{
  "firm": "Vector Systems LLC",
  "services": ["AI Agent Audits", "Governance Frameworks"],
  "verticals": ["Enterprise", "Financial Services", "Legal Tech"],
  "principal": "Ex-Credit Suisse AVP // CMU Scholar"
}

Running agents in production?

Request an Audit
04. Engagements

Selected Engagements

Production agent systems built and validated. The technical depth audit clients draw on.

INTERNAL RECORD
Dossier 01: Agentic Legal Drafting & Retrieval Platform
CONTEXT
Federal criminal defense litigation. Appellate brief drafting across thousands of cases, statutes, and citations. Attorney-client privilege obligations. Output errors carry direct legal consequence.
SYSTEM
Multi-agent production platform with specialized agents for fact-checking, argument generation, and citation handling. Private RAG on Qdrant and Elasticsearch with zero data egress. Schema-aligned document parsing with strict citation tracking. Policy-driven evaluation layer validating agent reasoning chains automatically.
EVALUATION FOCUS
Every citation traced to source. Every reasoning step logged at the decision point. Automated quality control loops monitoring multi-step agent trajectories. Briefs that typically required 10–40 attorney hours generated in under two minutes, with audit trail intact.
TECH STACK
[ Multi-Agent Orchestration // Private RAG // Qdrant // Elasticsearch // AWS ]
INTERNAL RECORD
Dossier 02: Multi-Agent Marketing Asset Pipeline
CONTEXT
Enterprise marketing operation. Consistent campaign generation across diverse product lines at testing velocity. Three-stage agent pipeline orchestrating multiple model providers.
SYSTEM
Persona identification agent generating structured buyer profiles. Positioning agent deriving distinct selling angles. Generation agent producing campaign copy across angles. Multi-model orchestration across GPT-4 and Claude with structured handoffs and persistent state.
EVALUATION FOCUS
Output validated at each handoff before downstream agents execute. Structured schema enforced across model boundaries. Demonstrates the multi-agent orchestration and inter-agent validation patterns that audits assess for enterprise deployments.
TECH STACK
[ Agentic Orchestration // GPT-4 // Claude // LangChain // Multi-Model Workflows ]
INTERNAL RECORD
Dossier 03: Contract Intelligence & Schema Extraction Pipeline
CONTEXT
Enterprise legal operations. High-volume unstructured contract repositories. Manual extraction bottlenecks and inconsistent terminology across document sets.
SYSTEM
Production LLM pipeline orchestrating GPT-4 extraction agents with structured schema enforcement. Hierarchical clustering to normalize disparate clause language into a unified taxonomy. Serverless deployment on AWS Lambda with validation gates between extraction and downstream analytics.
EVALUATION FOCUS
Schema-aligned output validated at each extraction step. Terminology normalization auditable across document boundaries. Demonstrates the structured output validation and schema enforcement patterns audits assess for production LLM systems handling regulated content.
TECH STACK
[ GPT-4 // LangChain // AWS Lambda // Schema Validation // Hierarchical Clustering ]
05. Principal

The Executive Bio

Charles Camp, Principal Architect

Charles Camp

Principal Architect
Tier-1 banking rigor combined with five years of independent AI delivery in production. At Credit Suisse, architected AML surveillance that passed Swiss regulatory sign-off and cut false positives by 80%. Co-authored the first open-source federated learning demonstrator for cross-institutional financial crime detection.

Carnegie Mellon research scholar. AWS Solutions Architect Associate. Five years operating independently across legal, financial, healthcare, and enterprise technology firms in the US and Europe — a breadth of production failure patterns most specialists in a single domain never see.

The audit and governance practice exists because most AI agents deployed in production have never been independently reviewed. Internal teams lack the adversarial perspective. External auditors lack the technical depth. Vector Systems provides both.

The Vector Standard (Guiding Principles)

  • [ 01 // INSTITUTIONAL-GRADE RIGOR ]
    The Origin: Tier-1 banking standards. The Application: Every audit is conducted as if the findings will face regulator scrutiny — because in regulated sectors they do, and in every other sector they should.
  • [ 02 // ADVERSARIAL BY DEFAULT ]
    The Origin: Production failure patterns across five years of agent work. The Application: We test what the agent does, not what the documentation says. Adversarial inputs, hallucinated tool calls, cascading errors. The audit assumes failure and proves resilience.
  • [ 03 // VERIFIABLE LOGIC ]
    The Origin: The bridge between accountability and code. The Application: Every agent decision traceable to source. Immutable logs at the decision point. Human-in-the-loop checkpoints at defined risk thresholds. Designed to survive post-incident review.
  • [ 04 // FINDINGS OVER THEATER ]
    The Origin: Five years of direct partnership with founders and operators. The Application: Reports are short, scored, and actionable. No 80-page checklist deliverables. The buyer should be able to act on the audit within a week of receiving it.
06. Pedigree

Institutional History

Credit Suisse
Carnegie Mellon
PepsiCo
Soteria Initiative
Glovo
Capgemini